Next: DE-NIC services
Up: Results of the
Previous: Results of the
Several models of financing DE-NIC services were discussed.
- Voluntary contributions by the end users.
- This resembles more or
less the shareware concept. If the user is satisfied with the service,
he is asked to pay for it. Even if this model will fit quite well into
the Internet way of setting up things (based on cooperation), it was
felt that a stable financing could not be achieved by this approach.
- Billing the end users.
- By this model, the end users will receive
DE-NIC services only, if they pay for it. This model would distribute
the costs of running the DE-NIC in a fair way. It is quite heavy in
handling, as a lot of bills for a small amount of money are generated
and have to be tracked. It could not be implemented in general, as
some of the service providers wanted one-stop shopping for its
customers. In 1992, another point against this model came up: It was
quite unusual to pay for certain services, as domain registrations and
network number assignment and it was felt, that this model would not
be accepted by the Internet community at large.
- Funding by the government.
- DE-NIC services
are partly monopolistic in nature. As telecommunication services in
1992 just started to be deregulated, it was quite natural to involve
the government in this monopolistic, governmental activity. This model
was not accepted by some of the service providers, because they felt
uneasy about asking for regulation, as the common feeling was to
deregulate the telecommunications business, rather than strengthen the
regulation.
- Funding by the service providers.
- This solution had a flaw with
those end users, who asked for network number registrations, but
were not customers of a service provider. This was resolved, as those
end users are considered a prospective customer base of the service
providers. The cost of serving those users can be seen as marketing
and presales costs. The service providers didn't want the DE-NIC to
provide consultancy on a general basis, as they didn't want to finance
activities, which they could sell to the user community as well. The
most crucial point was, that this model depends mainly on having all
major service providers involved, or funding will become unfair.
Despite the fact that none of the models had it good points only, the last solution
was considered the best available.
Next: DE-NIC services
Up: Results of the
Previous: Results of the
Andreas Schachtner
Fri Apr 28 15:28:39 MET DST 1995