|

FRANCAIS
ABOUT THE
INTERNET SOCIETY
ISOC Mission Statement
Membership
CONFERENCE OVERVIEW
Working Party
RealVideo Broadcast
Mbone Broadcast At-a-Glance
Program
Conference and Program Committees
Geneva and Palexpo
Call for Papers
Plenary Speakers
Evening Events
Internet Access Room
BOF Meetings
Pre-Post Tours
Chapter Activities
Internet Related Meetings
Reports From The Conference
PRE-CONFERENCE EVENTS
K-12 Workshop
Developing Countries Networking
Symposium
Technical Tutorials
Network Training
Workshops
SPONSORSHIP + EXHIBITION
Invitation
to Sponsors
INET'98 Sponsors
Previous INET Sponsors
Sponsor Benefits
Exhibition Hall
MEDIA/PRESS
Press Releases
Media Accreditation and Form
Official INET'98 Publications
REGISTRATION, HOUSING, TRAVEL
Registration Information
and Form
Hotel Information and Form
Tour Information and Form
Airline Travel
HELP PROMOTE INET'98
Organizations/Companies Displaying the INET'98 Logo
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS |
|

Reports
These reports were written by a team of local volunteers: Angela Merino, Assina Bounis, Celia Boyer, Eric Bianchi, Irčne Butor, Julian Albert Kilker and Melisa Makzume. The reports summarise information for people not able to attend the sessions. Their comprehensiveness and accuracy are not guaranteed. For more information, please contact the presenters directly. Their e-mail addresses are available at http://www.isoc.org/inet98/program.shtml
TRACK 4: Teaching and Learning
Session: To Net or Not to Net
By Angela Merino, 24 July 1998
Electronic Communication and the Humanities
Barton D. Thurber, Jack W. Pope - University of San Diego, USA
The speakers consider that using electronic communication as in a Virtual On-line
University does not deal with the essential aspects in teaching humanities. That is a
raison why people in humanities are not actively participating in the computer revolution.
They remark that in the Web, information is just given like in a library, but the
information is not knowledge, and the university is not a library. This is one of the
reasons why they consider that for humanities, Internet is not an adequate tool. Using the
Web, it is possible to talk and write quickly, but that is not the same as face to face
communication. They emphasise that in humanities, interaction is important. Education is
not a transfer of knowledge to the students. In some cultures there are gestures, which
are an important aspect of the communication, and hypermedia can not replace them. Also,
in humanities, there are other problems such as the transfer of credits for courses on the
Web.
The Pros and Cons of Implementing the Internet in the Classroom: Making
Sense of the Hype
Eszter Hargittai - Princeton University, United States
The speaker presents a list of advantages and disadvantages concerning the Internet as
a basic tool in the classroom. She points out that it is good for shy students but she
remarks that a disaventage is that the Internet does not contribute to the social
behaviour of students. Internet does however affect the social behaviour and the nature of
the interrelationships. For professors, using the Internet implies new skills and new
responsibilities. Then the author emphasises that Internet use implies the adoption of new
policies, new responsibilities: monitoring, limiting access to services, filtering
software, etc. She concludes that the Internet should not be considered as a substitute
for the tools of traditional education but as a complementary tool. With Internet aspects
of education have to be changed. The role of the teacher changes from an information
provider to an information guide.
See http://www.princenton.edu/~eszter/edu
|