Internet Society Logo All About ISOC All About the Internet Search/Site Map
Organization Members Members Only Home
Join Feedback
Publications Education and Training Public Policy Standards and Protocols Chapters Press Info Conferences Discussion Groups
   
Board of Trustees - Archived Documents
 
ISOC Document

Title:      Discussion Paper - ISOC Board Composition
Author(s):  G. Huston, D. Heath
Date:       2000-11-02
Committee:  BOT
Document:   mtg22-01
Revision:   1
Supersedes:
Status:     Discussion paper for consideration at the 12/2000 Board meeting
Maintainer: G. Huston
Access:     Unrestricted

1. Background

    ISOC currently has a Board structure of 16 Board members. Of these Board members 15 are elected by the individual membership and 1 position is an ex-officio position occupied by the President of the Society.

    In an organization such as ISOC the Board is intended to represent the interests of the stakeholders in a manner which is consistent with the characterization of the Society itself. At present, the major funding sector of ISOC, organizational membership, does not have direct representation on the Board. In addition, an increasing amount of individual membership activities is being undertaken through the framework of ISOC chapters. Using the already adopted structural composition of ISOC as an amalgam of activities concerning Internet Standards, Public Policy, Individual and Chapter membership and Education programs, then a case can be made that the composition of the Board should better reflect the various constituencies of each of these structural components.

    This proposal requests the Board to consider altering the representation on the Board of Trustees to better reflect the current structure of the Society.

2. Proposal

    The proposal is that 15 Board members be elected by three constituencies: Individual membership, the Corporate members' Advisory Council and the Chapters Council. This is in some ways similar to the structure adopted by ICANN in its efforts to have representation from a number of sectors who are considered to be stakeholders in ICANN's decision making process.

    Chapters will have an increasing role in the work of ISOC. The source of our individual membership will, more and more, come from and through them. Our future strength will be more dependent on their efforts and with direct representation on the Board, it will help to foster their growth and ours.

    Organizational members are the primary source of our funding. We also need them to be more directly involved. This is good for them and us, and represents a benefit for them beyond what we currently provide. They are "virtually" not represented currently - other than some board members do work for organizational members.

    Individual members would continue to elect members of the Board through a membership at large election process.

    This proposal is to change the composition of the Board as follows:

      Individual Membership 9
      Chapters 3
      Advisory Council 3

    The basis of the specific numbers allocated to each constituency ensure that individual members continue to form the basis of the Board's composition, while allowing Chapters and Corporate members to have more of a direct influence on the carriage of the Society's programs and the Society's chosen direction. The numbers also allow each Trustee to serve a three year term, so that each year 3 Trustees are elected by the individual membership and 1 from each of the Advisory Council and the Chapters Council.

3. Alternative Board Composition Arrangements

    There are a number of variation to this approach that may be contemplated by the Board.

    One approach is to allow a number of Board positions to be appointed by the Board itself. The rationale for such an approach is that it would be beneficial for the Society to be able to appoint a small number of Trustees based on whatever ISOC's needs are at the time. For example, ISOC may wish to appoint a leading industry figure to the Board in order to be more effective in gaining visibility and funding support from the industry sector. ISOC may also consider appointing an individual with stature within the area of public policy or from the foundational or international developmental organizational sector, again as a means of gaining both enhanced visibility into that sector and as a means of being more effective in gaining funding support. To this end, however, rather than the standard three-year term, such appointments should probably be for one-year terms, with an ability to re-appoint under mutual agreement if they are contemplated by the Board.

    Another extension of this approach would be to invite the IETF to nominate a number of individuals from within its community to serve as Trustees. The IETF is a major asset to/for ISOC. ISOC is the organizational support for the IETF and the society provides various forms of support, financially and otherwise. A similar argument could be made with respect to the ISTF.

4. Enabling Changes

    Any of the changes noted here would require an amendment to the ISOC By Laws. The relevant clause is in Article II, Section 2:

      "With the exception of the President, all Trustees shall be elected by the Regular Individual Members of the Society or shall be appointed by the Board to fill a vacancy which arises because an elected Trustee has ceased to serve."

    The simplest enabling change is to remove this clause from the By Laws, allowing the Board discretion to adopt procedures regarding the composition of the Board of Trustees without further changes to the By Laws

    However it may be useful to use a replacement clause allowing that the composition of the Board is to be determined by adoption of a Board procedure, and that a four fifths majority of the Trustees then in office is required to adopt the procedure, and a four fifths majority of the Trustees then in office is required to amend the procedure, making changes to the procedure require the same level of super majority as changes to the By Laws themselves.

    Alternatively, the composition of the Board may be specified in the By Laws, in which case further changes would also require amendments of the By Laws.

    Procedurally it is also appropriate to allow some time to phase in any such changes, so that the Board would need to also consider a timetable for adoption of such measures as part of the overall process of adoption of this proposed structure.

5. Action requested from the Board

    To consider this proposal, and if agreed, then to adopt a number of enabling motions concerning the adoption of procedures and amendment of the ISOC By Laws.



1775 Wiehle Ave., Suite 102, Reston, VA, USA 20190-5108
Tel: +1 703 326 9880 Fax: +1 703 326 9881

4, rue des Falaises, CH-1205, Geneva, Switzerland
Tel: +41 22 807 1444 Fax: +41 22 807 1445

This document <http://www.isoc.org/isoc/general/trustees/mtg22-01.shtml>
was last updated Monday, 18-Oct-2004 14:21:14 EDT.
Copyright © 2006 Internet Society. All Rights Reserved.

Webmaster@ISOC.ORG
Privacy Statement