![]() |
![]() |
March/April 2001
Screen Version
How Real Is the Internet Market in Developing Nations?
By Madanmohan Rao madanr@planetasia.com
Much discourse about the Internet economy in developing nations
seems to be heading toward increasing polarization. One camp--the
"e-uphoric" enthusiasts--believe that e-commerce is the answer
and will soon lift the sagging fortunes of all developing nations.
The other camp remains quite skeptical, believing that the Internet
is merely going to leave the bulk of the developing world's population
on the other side of the digital divide.
The reality, of course, lies somewhere in between, but unfortunately,
these two camps do not creatively engage in joint brainstorming
often enough. Under the right conditions, entrepreneurs in developing
nations can launch locally viable Internet ventures with real
value, but many developing nations also face very real constraints
in harnessing the Internet economy.
Some dialogue between the various entities on this spectrum is
beginning, fortunately; a glimpse of some of these dynamics in
action was available at a recent conference: Internet World Thailand,
in Bangkok. It featured speakers from academia, government, policy
think tanks, and the private sector and raised about eight hard-hitting
questions that are very relevant to Internet economy in other
developing nations as well.
When will our domestic Internet user base reach critical mass?
Many developing countries do not yet have a critical mass of Internet
users to justify significant investment by new Internet service
providers (ISPs), advertisers, or vendors. Internet usage in many
developing nations is still dominated by academics and techies
(phase 1 of diffusion). Phase 2 involves more adoption by teens
and youth, followed by young workers (phase 3). E-commerce initiatives
tend to emerge in a country between phases 2 and 3 of Internet
diffusion. For instance, the Internet in Thailand, with just about
a million users, is currently between phases 2 and 3.
Phase 4--full universal access--is still a distant dream for many
emerging economies. But being stuck in phase 1 or just entering
phase 2 often leads to some amount of frustration and disappointment
in emerging economies, especially when those involved are looking
at the greener grass on the other side of the fence.
When can e-commerce initiatives become self-sustaining?
Unless there are sufficiently high online usage and online spending,
domestic e-commerce may not be a viable proposition for many developing
nations. For instance, the current Internet user base in Thailand
does not yet have much buying power, says Somkiat Tangkitvanich,
research fellow at the Thailand Development Research Institute.
Most Thai users are in the age group of 20-29 years, so there
is potential for increased buying power only further down the
road.
Flat-rate ISP pricing and affordable leased lines still do not
exist in most developing nations, thus keeping Internet usage
times much lower than corresponding figures for mature Internet
economies; this also affects advertising/e-commerce potential.
For instance, in Thailand, leased lines are relatively much more
expensive than in Hong Kong, Malaysia, and Japan.
When will non-PC channels be viable for Internet traffic?
PCs and modems are still quite expensive for most citizens of
developing nations, so a lot of attention is focusing on Internet
access via cable TV modems and mobile phone channels. These are
yet to take off in developing nations, and even the much-hyped
WAP does not seem to have delivered in many parts of the world,
though Japan's i-Mode is often touted as a good example of breaking
the PC stranglehold on the Net market.
Much attention is focused on the next generation of broadband
wireless Internet in the hope that newer applications on more
user-friendly devices at lower costs will open up new gateways
to the Internet. In Thailand wireless penetration is set to overtake
the land-line user base by 2003 and has already overtaken the
PC user base. In Japan there are already more mobile handsets
in operation than land lines. Many Asian users are expected to
gravitate readily to Internet access via mobiles, since they are
not conditioned to richer interfaces like PC screens, which has
been a dampening factor for mobile Internet surfing in the United
States.
How can rural regions be tapped via the Internet?
In rural areas, both accessibility and affordability of Internet
facilities are critical issues. Ensuring Internet accessibility
for all citizens needs to be written into the constitution of
a country, but it remains to be seen how nations like Thailand
can meet that challenge, according to Pichet Durongkaveroj, director
of Thailand's National Electronic Commerce Resource Center.
Thailand is only 30 percent urbanized, yet 90 percent of its Internet
users are in cities. Urban players must also extend their reach
to cooperatives in villages. Though individual villagers do not
have the resources to tap into the Net, local cooperatives may
be better suited to handle infrastructure and training issues
for handicrafts, traders, and agribusinesses, Durongkaveroj says.
What local niches can we develop in the Internet economy?
Though the domestic Internet market may be relatively small in
many emerging economies, there may be certain niches that can
be developed for local e-commerce. And since the Internet is a
global medium, the real niches could actually be leveraged from
within but for an outside audience--tourism being a prime example
in this regard, especially for popular-destination countries like
Thailand.
Exports--of raw materials, handicrafts and gems--also lend themselves
to promotion for an external audience, as evinced by sites like
Thai-Gems.com. In the case of developing countries with a large
diaspora population, services like gifting, investing, and financial
remittance to the home country are well suited for aggregation
and exploitation via the Internet.
Expat remittances bringing foreign exchange into the country are
part of the business model for sites like Thailand.com, according
to its chief information office Ram Piyaket. So while 90 percent
of e-commerce in countries like the United States may be domestic,
the figure may be reversed for many developing nations.
Another positioning strategy for emerging economies is via developing
regional hubs for Internet software and services development,
as evinced by Ireland, Singapore, and Indian cities like Bangalore.
When can sufficient trust for progressive alliancing be generated?
Much of e-commerce infrastructure involves progressive moves on
the legislative and regulatory fronts by government agencies and
industry organizations, but the Internet seems to have become
a political football in many developing nations, with various
government agencies vying with one another for control of Internet
traffic and revenues. In many countries, the two sectors, public
and private, do not seem to have mutual trust, thereby slowing
down the creation of a progressive Internet environment.
Alliancing is also needed with the banking and financial services
system to facilitate services ranging from local bill payment
and online banking to credit card payment gateways and remittance
services for expats. Thai retailers, content providers, and fulfillment
players have recently formed such alliances, according to Matthias
Goertz, senior manager at the Boston Consulting Group in Bangkok.
Other alliances involving mobile Internet access--such as MWeb,
Loxinfo, and Siam2You.com--have begun to take off as well.
How can we educate our children for the digital future?
Internet literacy of children today is key for growth of the domestic
e-conomy tomorrow. But most colleges and schools in developing
countries are not yet online; access via kiosks in libraries coupled
with education for students and teachers will be key to increasing
awareness about the Net for the next generation.
Virtual universities and distance education offer a lot of promise
and potential, especially in advanced Internet economies like
Australia and Canada, but it will still be a while before educators
and students in developing nations can find audiences and educational
resources online. Initiatives like SchoolNet in Thailand are geared
toward providing a modest dose of Internet access in government
schools.
How can governments be brought fully on board the Internet agenda?
Today, with the exception perhaps of North Korea, every country
in the world has some form of Internet access, at least in its
major cities. But while all governments of developing countries
have taken a tentative first step in opening up Internet access
via local points of presence, they have not gone much beyond that
in terms of promoting government usage of the Internet or increasing
diffusion and lowering access costs in remote parts of the country.
In Thailand, for instance, there does not seem to be much political
will on the part of the government for international circuit liberalization,
according to Somkiat Tangkitvanich, research fellow at the Thailand
Development Research Institute. Thus, gateways to the international
Internet will continue to be monopolized by the government's Communications
Authority.
Governments are also big buyers of products and services and can
be big drivers of G2B (government-to-business) and G2C (government-to-citizen)
services. But this has yet to take off in a significant way in
Thailand, says Chet Chetsandtikhun, vice president of portal MWeb
(Thailand).
In conclusion, then, the real opportunities of the Internet economy
can be tapped to a large extent in many developing nations, provided
the real obstacles get identified and acknowledged. With sufficient
dialogue and cooperation between the various public-, private-,
and civil-sector players, the Internet market can indeed become
quite real for many emerging economies.
Join the Internet Society today: http://www.isoc.org/welcome/